Little Goose Full Flow Construction Comments
From PTAGISWiki
Contents |
Synopsis
This Wiki page will contain all comments provided by PSMFC regarding the drawing reviews at each stage of the review process. The comments in this page specifically address concerns by PSMFC regarding the evolution of the Full Flow system.
60 Percent drawing comments submitted May 21st 07
- Sheet M-509 Detail C1
Drill and Tapp 3/8" hole in L bracket so that bolts thread into bracket
- Sheet M-509 Detail C4
Clarify gap between field clamps and pipe. 1 inch nominal gap.
- Sheet E-601 Detail: Fiber Optics
Fiber Optic cable should be 62.5/125 micron 900 micron buffer tube, plentum rated MM cable.
- Sheet E-601
Explictly callout, "Conduit hubs are to be used in all locations where conduits enter PIT tag electronics enclosures".
- Sheet E-601
All conduits entering transciever enclosures shall enter from the bottom.
- Sheet SD-101
Suggest that the installation be moved down stream to monoliths 22 through 26 in order to minimize turbulence out of flume loop.
- Sheet M-502.
Emphysis tolerance of fiberglass pipe O.D. in order to maintain roundness of RF clamp gap.
- Sheet E-002
Something to consider, rather than a single shielded/isolation transformer, Maybe the case where we install a double shielded/isolated transformer. Reason for this is grounding of the PIT tag system more than likely will come from the main plant ground rather than a seperate newly installed grounding system.
- Sheet E-601 Note 3.
A quantity of 9 RIP tyes per transciever enclosure will be required for cable management.
- Sheet E-601
Panel heaters in transciever enclosures shall not be powered from the isolated/clean power circuit.
- Sheet S-501
Remove detail about the 3/8" galvanized headed anchor. Detail from LMJ not necessary.
- Sheet M-501
Detail C1 needs clarification on 2 mating surfaces for sleeve.
- Sheet M-101 and 401.
No dimensional details.
- Sheet M-503
Detail A3 , no dimensional/mechanical details.
- Sheet M-509.
Add detail for UHMW Polyethylene block to be drilled and tapped to match machine screw to a depth of 3/8" minimum , 1/2" max.
- Sheet M-509.
Add coupler plates for mating two halves of clamps. (These drawings are very vague)PSMFC could provide a revised drawing of the field clamps.
- Sheet M-601.
Where do the circuits for the test recepticle and heaters originate?
Design and Submittle Schedule
Scottl 15:12, 26 June 2007 (PDT)
Per Stan Heller. Here's the schedule we worked up at today's meeting:
June 22/07 - 90% Plans and specs complete (PIT tag)
6/26/07 - 60% dewatering structure, flume extension and valve actuator
6/27 - Distribute electronic 90% design (PIT tag)
6/27 - Distribute electronic 60% design (dewatering mods, flume extension, actuator valves)
July 6 - 60/90% design review comments due (more time for 90% pkg if needed)
7/11 - 60/90% design review evaluation due 7/11 (more time for 90% pkg if needed)
7/20 - 90% dewatering structure & flume extension - Engineering complete
7/25 - Distribute for 90% review
Aug 1 - Review comments due
8/7 - Evaluation of comments complete
8/7 - Synopsis (pre-advertise)
BCOE/ITR
8/10 - BCOE review set distributed
8/15 - BCOE comments due
8/16 - BCOE review meeting (if needed)
8/17 (19) - BCOE evaluation complete (comments incorporated in the plans)
Advertise Contract 8/27/07 Bid opening 9/27/07
FY 2008
Award Contract 10/07
Construction period (winter maintenance window) 12/07 – 03/08
Scottl 16:21, 4 September 2007 (PDT)
- BCOE plans and Specs meeting clarified some misconceptions the grounding scheme. PSMFC clarified why this approach is necessary. Oni Gomez has moved on and his replacement is Dan Pullen. 509.527.7561. Dan agreed that we will commence with the original design ans that the 5 ohms or less criteria may be difficult to achieve. He also indicated that some further work may be need done to satisfy this requirement.
- PSMFC still has 5 pending issues that have not been addressed in the Dr. Checks system. COE will have to respond before they can be closed. Most of the pending topics were addressed in the BCOE meeting. Will follow up with Stan Heller so that we can close these comments by the deadline of this Friday.
---E-Mail from Stan Heller--- This is an E-mail outlining the fast schedule and critical milestones they need to make for the project to stay on track. There is still a lot to do yet and only a little bit of time left to do it. So I will need everyone's cooperation and effort to make it happen (and may take overtime, if needed).
Below is the rest of the schedule that Randy laid out in his email below:
10 September - BCOE'd design package to Contracting.
24 September - issue the IFB.
24 October - open bids.
31 October - award Contract.
In order to get the design package to contracting this coming Monday (or close to it), the backcheck copy needs to be out for review this Friday (9/7). It will be posted electronically for the backcheckers (and on FTP site for PSMFC).
So revised plans and specs need to be completed by noon this Friday Sept 7.
Let Lori know when you are done, and let me know if this is going to be a problem).
Backchecking needs to be completed Friday afternoon or Monday morning (let me know if this is going to be a problem). If there are comments that can not be closed, please talk to the Engineer to request those changes directly and let me know if it looks like there is a problem getting the comment closed out.
Pictures
Pictures
Journal
Text, copies of emails
Notes
Notes
Meeting Minutes
Meeting 11/2/06
Links
Pertinent links
